← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Osiashvilli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-12-11 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Colorado College
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Omaha Lancers USHL 14 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Omaha Lancers USHL 47 3 4 7 0.149 0.0878 0.0904 0.4472 0.4606
2025-26 NAHL 47 9 14 23 0.489 0.1798 0.1843 0.5166 0.5295
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42945
Forward overall
#2609
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Colorado College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHL 2014-15
0.15
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.27
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
NAHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2024-25
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2022-23
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.