← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ritter Coombs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-11-03 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Providence
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 El Paso Rhinos NAHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 El Paso Rhinos NAHL 3 2 1 3 1.000 0.3674 0.4120 1.0555 1.1836
2024-25 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 50 10 13 23 0.460 0.2714 0.2781 1.3816 1.4159
2025-26 Erie Otters OHL 61 6 4 10 0.164 0.0948 0.0923 0.4211 0.4100
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32899
Forward overall
#1790
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Providence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Providence
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.50
actual FR PPG at Providence
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.25
actual FR PPG at Providence
USHL 2013-14
0.13
actual FR PPG at Providence

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2010-11
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.