← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ritter Coombs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-11-03 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Providence
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 El Paso Rhinos NAHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 El Paso Rhinos NAHL 3 2 1 3 1.000 0.3674 0.4120 1.0569 1.1852
2024-25 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 50 10 13 23 0.460 0.2714 0.2781 1.3803 1.4146
2025-26 Erie Otters OHL 61 6 4 10 0.164 0.0948 0.0923 0.4292 0.4179
2026-27 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1475 0.1475 0.7502 0.7502
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33339
Forward overall
#1815
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

Providence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Providence
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.50
actual FR PPG at Providence
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.25
actual FR PPG at Providence
NAHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Providence

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2021-22
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2022-23
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.