← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Vandenberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-09-08 Country: Canada
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
Providence
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 55 9 9 18 0.327 0.2084 0.2328 0.9808 1.0958
2025-26 Ottawa 67's OHL 59 25 25 50 0.848 0.5058 0.5392 2.1952 2.3401
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6005
Forward overall
#86
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.57 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Providence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

WHL 2023-24
0.75
actual FR PPG at Providence
USHL 2022-23
0.60
actual FR PPG at Providence
USHL 2023-24
0.54
actual FR PPG at Providence
NTDP-U18 2019-20
0.53
actual FR PPG at Providence

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2016-17
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.