← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Green Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-08-13 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 42 3 14 17 0.405 0.0992 0.1122 0.2787 0.3151
2023-24 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 56 18 39 57 1.018 0.2495 0.2691 0.7008 0.7559
2024-25 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 62 4 10 14 0.226 0.1332 0.1350 0.6782 0.6874
2025-26 Brampton Steelheads OHL 48 3 7 10 0.208 0.1205 0.1160 0.5352 0.5151
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9096
Defenseman overall
#1846
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NA3HL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.29
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
NCDC 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
USHL 2016-17
0.40
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2017-18
1.103 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2007-08
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.