← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keaton Orrey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-01-12 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Eagan USHS-MN 16 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Eagan USHS-MN 24 9 3 12 0.500 0.0633 0.0633 0.1214 0.1214
2023-24 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 53 6 13 19 0.358 0.1317 0.1424 0.3789 0.4096
2024-25 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 37 4 2 6 0.162 0.0957 0.0942 0.4867 0.4791
2025-26 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 59 7 15 22 0.373 0.2200 0.2060 1.1190 1.0475
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9226
Defenseman overall
#1874
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.29
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
BCHL 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
USHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
NAHL 2014-15
0.05
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2007-08
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2009-10
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2022-23
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.