IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexander Hage Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-05 Country: Canada
Michigan
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Chicago Steel USHL 37 6 5 11 0.297 0.1754 0.1908 0.8929 0.9712
2025-26 Niagara IceDogs OHL 48 4 10 14 0.292 0.1687 0.1748 0.7495 0.7768
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32457
Forward overall
#517
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siroky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Widmar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Evans
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Oglevie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Talcott
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG

Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Dexter Dancs
BCHL 2012-13
0.28
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Kaden Nelson
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Alex Bump
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.95
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Owen Baker
USHL 2021-22
0.29
actual FR PPG at Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Brogan Shea
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
James Ring
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Toby Sengvongxay
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.