← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Nolan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-14 Country: USA
Colorado College
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Tri-City Storm USHL 55 1 4 5 0.091 0.0536 0.0566 0.2728 0.2879
2025-26 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 36 11 9 20 0.556 0.3277 0.3300 1.6672 1.6789
2026-27 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 5 3 1 4 0.800 0.4719 0.4719 2.4006 2.4006
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25266
Forward overall
#836
Forward born in 2007
#2625
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Colorado College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2019-20
0.27
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHL 2019-20
0.08
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHL 2012-13
0.25
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
NAHL 2020-21
0.43
actual FR PPG at Colorado College

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.