IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Martyniuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-12-31 Country: USA
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 54 0 8 8 0.148 0.1101 0.1167 0.5526 0.5859
2025-26 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 59 2 9 11 0.186 0.1386 0.1394 0.6955 0.6994
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17115
Defenseman overall
#925
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Jake Linhart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Jacobs
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Willett
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ RIT (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kale Bennett
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Western Michigan
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
R.J. Gicewicz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Michigan State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Zach Osburn
USHL 2013-14
0.51
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Josh Jacobs
USHL 2012-13
0.26
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Mitch Eliot
USHL 2014-15
0.09
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Tommy Miller
USHL 2015-16
0.28
actual FR PPG at Michigan State

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bailey
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Johnson
Saint John's · 2014-15
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2006-07
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.