IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Martyniuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-12-31 Country: USA
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 54 0 8 8 0.148 0.1101 0.1167 0.5553 0.5888
2025-26 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 59 2 9 11 0.186 0.1386 0.1394 0.6990 0.7029
2026-27 Saginaw Spirit OHL 6 0 2 2 0.333 0.1928 0.1928 0.8727 0.8727
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17338
Defenseman overall
#1034
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Clint Lewis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Garrett Cecere
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jack Stander
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Gustav Olofsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Michigan State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Tommy Bleyl
NE-Prep 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Zach Osburn
USHL 2014-15
0.51
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Mitch Eliot
USHL 2015-16
0.09
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Josh Jacobs
USHL 2013-14
0.26
actual FR PPG at Michigan State

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Rose
Elmira · 2000-01
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Cox
Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Byrne
St. Norbert · 2021-22
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.