IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaeden Mercier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 44 5 11 16 0.364 0.0932 0.0932 0.2741 0.2741
2020-21 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1281 0.1281 0.3769 0.3769
2021-22 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 39 18 26 44 1.128 0.2890 0.2817 0.8504 0.8291
2022-23 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 38 12 38 50 1.316 0.3371 0.3118 0.9919 0.9175
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lindenwood D1 CCHA JR 29 3 5 8 0.276
2024-25 Lindenwood D1 CCHA SR 29 8 3 11 0.379
2023-24 Lindenwood D1 CCHA JR 28 3 8 11 0.393
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2023-24 · Lindenwood
+53.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14624
Forward overall
#737
Forward born in 2002
#101
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Reid Bibb
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Bolden
Elmira · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Broughman
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.