← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaeden Mercier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 44 5 11 16 0.364 0.1108 0.1108 0.2695 0.2695
2020-21 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1523 0.1523 0.3705 0.3705
2021-22 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 39 18 26 44 1.128 0.3436 0.3350 0.8361 0.8151
2022-23 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 38 12 38 50 1.316 0.4008 0.3707 0.9751 0.9019
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lindenwood D1 CCHA JR 29 3 5 8 0.276
2024-25 Lindenwood D1 CCHA SR 29 8 3 11 0.379
2023-24 Lindenwood D1 CCHA JR 28 3 8 11 0.393
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2023-24 · Lindenwood
+28.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14164
Forward overall
#708
Forward born in 2002
#125
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2016-17
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.