← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frantisek Netusil Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-14 Country: Czechia
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.2360 0.2481 1.2014 1.2628
2025-26 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 51 6 11 17 0.333 0.1966 0.1971 1.0010 1.0038
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17699
Forward overall
#511
Forward born in 2007
#1726
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHS-MN 2023-24
0.62
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.95
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2007-08
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2025-26
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2020-21
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.