IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frantisek Netusil Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-14 Country: Czechia
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.2360 0.2481 1.2003 1.2617
2025-26 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 51 6 11 17 0.333 0.1966 0.1971 1.0001 1.0029
2026-27 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 7 4 6 10 1.429 0.5249 0.5319 1.5099 1.5299
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18032
Forward overall
#547
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Luc Gerdes
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sam Anas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dominik Shine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jason Polin
USHL 2018-19
0.29
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Matt Iacopelli
USHL 2013-14
0.26
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Cole Gallant
USHL 2017-18
0.38
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Ean Somoza
BCHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Shawn Skelly
Adrian · 2006-07
1.655 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Miller
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Geordan Buffoline
University of New England · 2018-19
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.