IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aleksa Babic Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-08-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Estevan Bruins SJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0854 0.0854 0.2470 0.2470
2021-22 Estevan Bruins SJHL 45 1 18 19 0.422 0.1082 0.1083 0.3129 0.3133
2022-23 Estevan Bruins SJHL 56 4 38 42 0.750 0.1921 0.1828 0.5558 0.5288
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trine D3 NCHA GR 15 1 3 4 0.267
2024-25 Trine D3 NCHA SR 12 2 6 8 0.667
2023-24 Trine D3 NCHA JR 12 1 1 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2023-24 · Trine
+15.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7444
Defenseman overall
#1765
Defenseman born in 2002
#590
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Fackey
New England College · 2004-05
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Strawn
Endicott · 2018-19
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Whidden
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.719 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.