IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Johno Hoins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Portsmouth Abbey NE-Prep 24 6 10 16 0.667 0.1286 0.1286 0.3051 0.3051
2021-22 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 42 9 14 23 0.548 0.1403 0.1402 0.4058 0.4054
2022-23 WB/Scranton Knights NCDC 43 7 6 13 0.302 0.0699 0.0672 0.2444 0.2348
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Manhattanville D3 UCHC GR 25 3 6 9 0.360
2024-25 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 27 8 13 21 0.778
2023-24 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 26 6 5 11 0.423
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2023-24 · Manhattanville
+412.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32603
Forward overall
#1949
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Spotts
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Lovisek
Adrian · 2021-22
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Storjohann
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.