IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Dean Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-05-14 Country: USA
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 52 15 14 29 0.558 0.2713 0.2850 1.3623 1.4309
2026-27 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 5 1 1 2 0.400 0.1946 0.1946 0.9771 0.9771
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19276
Forward overall
#322
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
Christian Lampasso
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

A.J. Drobot
NAHL 2016-17
0.26
actual FR PPG at Maine
Justin Rai
BCHL 2012-13
0.08
actual FR PPG at Maine
Ryan Smith
USHL 2015-16
0.30
actual FR PPG at Maine
Thomas Freel
CCHL 2019-20
0.42
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Bryan Tang
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ty Enns
Marian · 2016-17
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Mazzetti
Elmira · 2002-03
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.