← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robin Benoit Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-07-15 Country: Canada
Nebraska Omaha
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 McCall Smokejumpers USPHL-Premier 43 27 25 52 1.209 0.1582 0.1887 0.4104 0.4895
2024-25 Sherbrooke Phoenix QMJHL 28 4 5 9 0.321 0.1579 0.1680 0.8582 0.9131
2025-26 Sherbrooke Phoenix QMJHL 61 17 16 33 0.541 0.2658 0.2703 1.4446 1.4688
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23441
Forward overall
#739
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

Nebraska Omaha Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.70
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
BCHL 2023-24
0.09
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
WHL 2022-23
0.46
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
BCHL 2016-17
0.50
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2018-19
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2009-10
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.