← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dallas Potter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-09 Country: USA
Sacred Heart
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.2039 0.2337 0.4001 0.4585
2024-25 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 47 4 10 14 0.298 0.1094 0.1202 — —
2025-26 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 31 2 4 6 0.194 0.1141 0.1148 0.5806 0.5843
2026-27 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 6 1 2 3 0.500 0.2949 0.2949 1.5004 1.5004
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43360
Forward overall
#1926
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

Sacred Heart Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

CCHL 2021-22
0.08
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
USHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
OJHL 2012-13
0.56
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2012-13
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2016-17
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.