← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Chartrand Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-03-03 Country: Canada
Boston College
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 35 2 5 7 0.200 0.0983 0.1031 0.5339 0.5598
2026-27 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 6 0 2 2 0.333 0.1638 0.1638 0.8898 0.8898
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17624
Defenseman overall
#1048
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Boston College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2013-14
0.18
actual FR PPG at Boston College
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.23
actual FR PPG at Boston College
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.54
actual FR PPG at Boston College
BCHL 2019-20
0.10
actual FR PPG at Boston College

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2017-18
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2020-21
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.