← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyden Bergeson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-21 Country: USA
Augustana
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Moorhead USHS-MN 27 20 17 37 1.370 0.1735 0.1735 0.3327 0.3327
2024-25 Moorhead USHS-MN 31 25 26 51 1.645 0.2083 0.2083 — —
2025-26 Madison Capitols USHL 23 11 11 22 0.957 0.5642 0.5687 2.8702 2.8931
2026-27 Penticton Vees WHL 7 2 5 7 1.000 0.4865 0.4865 2.4427 2.4427
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4213
Forward overall
#48
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Michigan (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.59 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Augustana Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.46
actual FR PPG at Augustana
NAHL 2022-23
0.43
actual FR PPG at Augustana
NAHL 2022-23
0.35
actual FR PPG at Augustana
SuperElit 2023-24
0.55
actual FR PPG at Augustana

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.