← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sheldon Rioux Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-24 Country: Canada
Brown
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Colorado Grit NAHL 15 2 3 5 0.333 0.1225 0.1408 0.3523 0.4048
2024-25 Colorado Grit NAHL 56 12 18 30 0.536 0.1968 0.2158 — —
2025-26 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 57 2 6 8 0.140 0.0690 0.0697 0.3748 0.3784
2026-27 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 7 0 2 2 0.286 0.1050 0.1065 0.3020 0.3064
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41087
Forward overall
#1764
Forward born in 2007
#4417
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

Brown Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.80
actual FR PPG at Brown
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Brown
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Brown
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Brown

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.