← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sheldon Rioux Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-24 Country: Canada
Brown
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Colorado Grit NAHL 15 2 3 5 0.333 0.1225 0.1408 0.3518 0.4042
2024-25 Colorado Grit NAHL 56 12 18 30 0.536 0.1968 0.2158
2025-26 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 57 2 6 8 0.140 0.0690 0.0697 0.3749 0.3785
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40568
Forward overall
#1696
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Brown Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Brown
USHL 2018-19
0.11
actual FR PPG at Brown
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.80
actual FR PPG at Brown
BCHL 2021-22
0.07
actual FR PPG at Brown

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2009-10
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2014-15
0.483 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.