IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Salvatore Viviano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-09-06 Country: USA
Northern Michigan
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 3 2 1 3 1.000 0.3674 0.4082 1.0555 1.1726
2025-26 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 61 16 24 40 0.656 0.3868 0.3940 1.9693 2.0058
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

88%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9121
Forward overall
#191
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Greenberg
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Miami (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luke Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG

Northern Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Grant Slukynsky
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.26
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
Demico Hannoun
BCHL 2013-14
0.33
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
Billy Renfrew
NAHL 2021-22
0.10
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
Jakub Altrichter
SuperElit 2021-22
0.59
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Logan DiScanio
University of New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Grandbois
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.