IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Meyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-04-10 Country: USA
Boston University
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Rivers School NE-Prep 30 18 21 39 1.300 0.2575 0.2575 0.5923 0.5923
2024-25 Rivers School NE-Prep 28 41 29 70 2.500 0.4952 0.4952 1.1390 1.1390
2025-26 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 70 29 41 70 1.000 0.7433 0.7576 3.7314 3.8034
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

92%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3425
Forward overall
#3
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Seamus Malone
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.74 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Stone
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Air Force (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Average
NCAAe PPG
Austin Poganski
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jack Eichel
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Boston University (1.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Elite
NCAAe PPG
J.T. Compher
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ Michigan (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Boston University Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Trevor Zegras
NTDP-U18 2017-18
1.09
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Conrad Fondrk
NTDP-U18 2023-24
0.32
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Devin Kaplan
NTDP-U18 2020-21
0.57
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Clayton Keller
USHL 2014-15
1.45
actual FR PPG at Boston University

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.