← New Search ↗ Social Card

Axel Löfgren Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-06-22 Country: Sweden
Minnesota
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 MoDo Hockey U20 SuperElit 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 SHL-J20 18 2 0 2 0.111 0.0617 0.0649 0.1480 0.1557
2023-24 Luleå HF U20 SuperElit 45 4 6 10 0.222 0.0877 0.0880 0.3018 0.3027
2024-25 BCHL 42 13 20 33 0.786 0.3027 0.2977 1.1434 1.1243
2025-26 Fargo Force USHL 56 10 23 33 0.589 0.3476 0.3157 1.7699 1.6074
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3552
Defenseman overall
#919
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.55
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.72
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
NAHL 2021-22
0.06
actual FR PPG at Minnesota

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2012-13
1.846 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.