← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caleb Pittsley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-11-16 Country: USA
Augustana
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Edina USHS-MN 31 5 13 18 0.581 0.0735 0.0735 0.1410 0.1410
2024-25 Edina USHS-MN 30 21 22 43 1.433 0.1815 0.1815 0.3480 0.3480
2025-26 Madison Capitols USHL 62 11 16 27 0.435 0.2569 0.2642 1.3068 1.3438
2026-27 Madison Capitols USHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1475 0.1475 0.7502 0.7502
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18321
Forward overall
#557
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Augustana Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2020-21
0.46
actual FR PPG at Augustana
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.43
actual FR PPG at Augustana
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Augustana
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.35
actual FR PPG at Augustana

D2/3 Comparables

Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rivier · 2023-24
0.952 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.