← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryland Rooney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-03-24 Country: USA
Wisconsin
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 27 9 15 24 0.889 0.1125 0.1125 0.2159 0.2159
2024-25 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 26 33 32 65 2.500 0.3165 0.3165 0.6073 0.6073
2025-26 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 56 13 9 22 0.393 0.2318 0.2540 1.1800 1.2931
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10392
Forward overall
#26
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Maine (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Yale (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.32 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston College (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Wisconsin Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.48
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
USHL 2015-16
0.43
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
SHL-J20 2014-15
0.76
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
USHL 2013-14
0.57
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2014-15
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2004-05
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2005-06
1.258 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.