← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryland Rooney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-03-24 Country: USA
Top 45 — 2027 NHL Draft Prospect
Wisconsin
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 27 9 15 24 0.889 0.1125 0.1125 0.2158 0.2158
2024-25 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 26 33 32 65 2.500 0.3165 0.3165 0.6070 0.6070
2025-26 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 56 13 9 22 0.393 0.2318 0.2540 1.1790 1.2921
2026-27 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 6 2 5 7 1.167 0.6882 0.6882 3.5009 3.5009
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10597
Forward overall
#45
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.96 PPG
→ Michigan (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.69 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Denver (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Miami (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Average
NCAAe PPG

Wisconsin Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

SHL-J20 2015-16
0.76
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
NTDP-U18 2021-22
1.00
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
USHL 2022-23
0.46
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
AJHL 2018-19
0.49
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.