IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matej Teply Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-03-02 Country: USA
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 11 1 3 4 0.364 0.1336 0.1450 0.3838 0.4166
2023-24 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 45 5 34 39 0.867 0.3184 0.3304 0.9148 0.9493
2024-25 Brooks Bandits BCHL 50 7 12 19 0.380 0.1464 0.1417 0.5530 0.5353
2025-26 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 56 6 16 22 0.393 0.2318 0.2070 1.1800 1.0536
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Volonnino
Plymouth State · 2014-15
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Zack Bross
UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.518 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Dozois
Wentworth · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.