IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Finnegan Sears Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-05-04 Country: USA
Top 51 — 2027 NHL Draft Prospect
Boston College
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 56 18 17 35 0.625 0.4646 0.4751 2.3436 2.3965
2026-27 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 8 2 8 10 1.250 0.9291 0.9291 4.6872 4.6872
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11047
Forward overall
#51
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Taylor Cammarata
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.98 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Stepan
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Kloos
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.93 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Boston College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Teddy Stiga
NTDP-U18 2023-24
0.83
actual FR PPG at Boston College
Matt Boldy
NTDP-U18 2018-19
0.76
actual FR PPG at Boston College
Jeremy Bracco
USHL 2014-15
0.60
actual FR PPG at Boston College
Cutter Gauthier
NTDP-U18 2021-22
1.16
actual FR PPG at Boston College

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.