IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Finnegan Sears Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-05-04 Country: USA
Boston College
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 56 18 17 35 0.625 0.4646 0.4751 2.3321 2.3847
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

82%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10843
Forward overall
#32
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Ryan Hitchcock
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Yale (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alex Tuch
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Boston College (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Seamus Malone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.74 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joe Wegwerth
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Chris Wilkie
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Boston College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Danny Weight
USHL 2017-18
0.11
actual FR PPG at Boston College
Gabe Perreault
USHL 2021-22
1.67
actual FR PPG at Boston College
Oliver Wahlstrom
NTDP-U18 2016-17
0.53
actual FR PPG at Boston College
William Moore
USHL 2023-24
0.30
actual FR PPG at Boston College

D2/3 Comparables

Joseph Fiorino
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Ford
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Reifler
Elmira · 2016-17
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.