← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce Mattern Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-12-07 Country: USA
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Watertown Shamrocks NAHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Fargo Force USHL 51 8 8 16 0.314 0.1851 0.1909 0.9413 0.9706
2026-27 Fargo Force USHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1966 0.1966 1.0001 1.0001
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29933
Forward overall
#1078
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.23
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
AJHL 2014-15
0.62
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
NAHL 2015-16
0.12
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
NAHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2025-26
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.