IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Schneider Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-05-16 Country: Canada
Robert Morris
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.3354 0.3778 0.9254 1.0424
2024-25 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 54 3 14 17 0.315 0.1056 0.1133 0.2913 0.3127
2025-26 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 52 4 11 15 0.288 0.1702 0.1707 0.8665 0.8692
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11081
Defenseman overall
#1494
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Robert Morris Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Robert Powers
OJHL 2012-13
0.00
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris
David Lafrance
CCHL 2019-20
0.29
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris
John Babcock
WHL 2022-23
0.33
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris
Geoff Lawson
CCHL 2015-16
0.13
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris

D2/3 Comparables

Mike McPherson
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
David Italiano
Williams · 2011-12
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan DiScanio
University of New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.