← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Schneider Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-05-16 Country: Canada
Robert Morris
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.3354 0.3778 0.9252 1.0421
2024-25 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 54 3 14 17 0.315 0.1056 0.1133 0.2913 0.3127
2025-26 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 52 4 11 15 0.288 0.1702 0.1707 0.8657 0.8684
2026-27 Penticton Vees WHL 7 0 2 2 0.286 0.1390 0.1390 0.6979 0.6979
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11253
Defenseman overall
#1559
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Robert Morris Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2015-16
0.18
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris
WHL 2023-24
0.33
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris
CCHL 2016-17
0.13
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris
USHL 2015-16
0.20
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2005-06
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2007-08
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2009-10
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.