IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Herrington Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-09-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 47 2 8 10 0.213 0.0522 0.0560 0.1465 0.1571
2010-11 — OJHL 48 1 7 8 0.167 0.0409 0.0419 0.1148 0.1177
2011-12 — OJHL 43 3 7 10 0.233 0.0570 0.0559 0.1601 0.1571
2012-13 Pickering Panthers OJHL 52 2 9 11 0.211 0.0518 0.0483 0.1456 0.1356
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 23 1 2 3 0.130
2016-17 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SR 23 1 2 3 0.130
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 26 1 3 4 0.154
2015-16 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA JR 26 1 3 4 0.154
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 17 1 0 1 0.059
2014-15 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SO 17 1 0 1 0.059
2013-14 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 10 1 3 4 0.400
2013-14 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 10 1 3 4 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2013-14 · Concordia
+724.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23695
Defenseman overall
#2146
Defenseman born in 1992
#4402
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Riley Colvard
Wisconsin-Stout · 2012-13
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Zack MacQueen
Tufts · 2011-12
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Gilhooly
SUNY Potsdam · 2013-14
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.