← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Ritchie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-01-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Sudbury Cubs NOJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0334 0.0387 0.0833 0.0966
2008-09 Sudbury Cubs NOJHL 46 2 7 9 0.196 0.0327 0.0362 0.0815 0.0903
2009-10 Huntsville Otters OJHL 56 28 16 44 0.786 0.1926 0.2003 0.5410 0.5627
2010-11 OJHL 45 10 16 26 0.578 0.1416 0.1407 0.3978 0.3952
2011-12 OJHL 36 6 11 17 0.472 0.1157 0.1098 0.3251 0.3086
2012-13 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 38 28 33 61 1.605 0.2681 0.2443 0.6683 0.6089
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC 5 1 0 1 0.200
2015-16 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA 5 1 0 1 0.200
2014-15 Marian D3 NCHA 15 1 4 5 0.333
2013-14 Marian D3 NCHA 14 1 1 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2013-14 · Marian
-12.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20530
Forward overall
#763
Forward born in 1992
#117
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.