← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cade De St. Hubert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-05-30 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 45 8 11 19 0.422 0.1627 0.1676 0.6140 0.6325
2025-26 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 29 2 7 9 0.310 0.1830 0.1748 0.9311 0.8892
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Army D1 AHA FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25360
Forward overall
#1237
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2016-17
0.18
actual FR PPG at Army
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.17
actual FR PPG at Army
BCHL 2023-24
0.18
actual FR PPG at Army
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.25
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2011-12
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby · 2022-23
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2017-18
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.