IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drake Gram Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-16 Country: USA
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Omaha Lancers USHL 35 2 4 6 0.171 0.1011 0.1048 0.5148 0.5337
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23768
Defenseman overall
#1231
Defenseman born in 2008
#4121
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Alec McCrea
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Clint Lewis
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Alex Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
David Drake
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garrett Cecere
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jack Anderson
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.33
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Jonathan Wong
MJHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Joe Prouty
NAHL 2019-20
0.37
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Noah Houle
CCHL 2021-22
0.50
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Jobb
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Nieuwendyk
SUNY Brockport · 2008-09
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Coccimiglio
Neumann · 2021-22
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.