IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drake Gram Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-16 Country: USA
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Omaha Lancers USHL 35 2 4 6 0.171 0.1011 0.1048 0.5143 0.5331
2026-27 Windsor Spitfires OHL 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.1653 0.1653 0.7481 0.7481
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24023
Defenseman overall
#1344
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jack Anderson
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.33
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Connor Gengle
AJHL 2023-24
0.17
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Kim Elfving
SuperElit 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Noah Houle
SJHL 2022-23
0.50
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob Hipp
Saint John's · 2003-04
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Kneeland
Lake Forest · 2002-03
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Sawicki
Rivier · 2023-24
0.952 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.