IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sawyer Schmidt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-12-29 Country: USA
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Saginaw Spirit OHL 25 1 1 2 0.080 0.0463 0.0524 0.2095 0.2370
2026-27 Saginaw Spirit OHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1928 0.1928 0.8727 0.8727
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41510
Forward overall
#242
Forward born in 2009
#1347
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Joe Snively
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Pavelek
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jared Fiegl
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alec Marsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Penn State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Sheehy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Andon Cerbone
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.67
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
Anthony Cipollone
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.14
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
Michael Salandra
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
William Fällström
SuperElit 2014-15
0.55
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Jax Murray
Trinity · 2015-16
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Holmers
Aurora · 2014-15
1.053 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Wood
Utica · 2017-18
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.