← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeremy Poirier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-07-28 Country: USA
2020 · Round 3, Pick #72  ·  Calgary Flames Calgary Flames
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Air Force
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Holderness NE-Prep 29 8 12 20 0.690 0.1366 0.1366 0.3142 0.3142
2024-25 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0612 0.0646 0.1760 0.1858
2025-26 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 50 0 14 14 0.280 0.1079 0.1081
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6080
Defenseman overall
#1292
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG

Air Force Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Air Force
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.08
actual FR PPG at Air Force
BCHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Air Force
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.12
actual FR PPG at Air Force

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2011-12
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2021-22
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.