← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cade Sherman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-07 Country: USA
Augustana
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Rosemount USHS-MN 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Rosemount USHS-MN 27 10 11 21 0.778 0.0985 0.0985 0.1888 0.1888
2024-25 Rosemount USHS-MN 27 23 27 50 1.852 0.2345 0.2345 0.4496 0.4496
2025-26 Rosemount USHS-MN 31 23 20 43 1.387 0.1756 0.1756 — —
2026-27 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.2949 0.2949 1.5004 1.5004
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10732
Forward overall
#271
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Augustana Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.46
actual FR PPG at Augustana
USHS-MN 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Augustana
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.43
actual FR PPG at Augustana
BCHL 2019-20
0.62
actual FR PPG at Augustana

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2012-13
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2016-17
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.