← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cade Sherman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-07 Country: USA
Augustana
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Rosemount USHS-MN 6 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Rosemount USHS-MN 27 10 11 21 0.778 0.0985 0.0985 0.1889 0.1889
2024-25 Rosemount USHS-MN 27 23 27 50 1.852 0.2345 0.2345 0.4498 0.4498
2025-26 Rosemount USHS-MN 31 23 20 43 1.387 0.1756 0.1756
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10529
Forward overall
#249
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Augustana Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.43
actual FR PPG at Augustana
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.35
actual FR PPG at Augustana
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.46
actual FR PPG at Augustana
NAHL 2022-23
0.46
actual FR PPG at Augustana

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2001-02
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2006-07
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.