← New Search ↗ Social Card

Myles Brosnan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-10-19 Country: USA
2026 · Round 7, Pick #196  ·  Detroit Red Wings Detroit Red Wings
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Dexter NE-Prep 31 3 18 21 0.677 0.1362 0.1362 0.3098 0.3098
2024-25 Dexter NE-Prep 28 9 27 36 1.286 0.2586 0.2586 0.5880 0.5880
2025-26 Dexter NE-Prep 30 7 44 51 1.700 0.3419 0.3419 — —
2026-27 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 7 3 3 6 0.857 0.4211 0.4211 2.2881 2.2881
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2033
Defenseman overall
#249
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.43
actual FR PPG at Harvard
USHL 2020-21
0.08
actual FR PPG at Harvard
USHL 2023-24
0.33
actual FR PPG at Harvard
BCHL 2014-15
0.10
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.