IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Myles Brosnan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-10-19 Country: USA
2026 · Round 7, Pick #196  ·  Detroit Red Wings Detroit Red Wings
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Dexter NE-Prep 31 3 18 21 0.677 0.1342 0.1342 0.3086 0.3086
2024-25 Dexter NE-Prep 28 9 27 36 1.286 0.2547 0.2547 0.5858 0.5858
2025-26 Dexter NE-Prep 30 7 44 51 1.700 0.3368 0.3368 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1992
Defenseman overall
#232
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Gustav Olofsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Will Butcher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Clark Kuster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.29 No data
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ian Moore
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.43
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Jack Bar
USHL 2020-21
0.18
actual FR PPG at Harvard
John Fusco
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.08
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Matthew Biotti
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.07
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Ryan
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard McCartney
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Schroeder
Norwich · 2006-07
0.742 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.