IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Keeper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-06-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 54 13 28 41 0.759 0.1462 0.1513 0.4788 0.4954
2015-16 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 58 16 28 44 0.759 0.1460 0.1434 0.4784 0.4698
2016-17 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 48 23 25 48 1.000 0.1925 0.1796 0.6306 0.5885
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 36 7 15 22 0.611
2017-18 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 37 6 16 22 0.595
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2017-18 · Maine
+281.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5081
Defenseman overall
#931
Defenseman born in 1996
#241
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Conter
Southern Maine · 2006-07
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Nitkin
UMass Boston · 2017-18
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Place
SUNY Potsdam · 2009-10
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.