IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Mansbridge Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 — CCHL 16 1 0 1 0.062 0.0178 0.0179 0.0484 0.0487
2014-15 Navan Grads CCHL 59 5 17 22 0.373 0.1064 0.1022 0.2887 0.2773
2015-16 Winkler Flyers MJHL 59 16 27 43 0.729 0.2062 0.1896 0.4592 0.4222
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Neumann D3 MAC SR 21 3 13 16 0.762
2018-19 Neumann D3 MAC JR 23 9 6 15 0.652
2017-18 Neumann D3 MAC SO 23 1 10 11 0.478
2016-17 Neumann D3 MAC FR 26 2 5 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2016-17 · Neumann
+103.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31150
Forward overall
#1299
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joseph Sposit
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brock Krulicki
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Mason
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.