IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rory Garlasco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-08-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Nepean Raiders CCHL 53 5 15 20 0.377 0.0819 0.0805 0.2891 0.2841
2015-16 Nepean Raiders CCHL 61 8 11 19 0.311 0.0676 0.0632 0.2386 0.2230
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 25 0 1 1 0.040
2018-19 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 22 1 1 2 0.091
2017-18 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 10 0 4 4 0.400
2016-17 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 20 3 4 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2016-17 · Connecticut College
+428.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16069
Defenseman overall
#1964
Defenseman born in 1995
#1306
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Kozak
Lake Forest · 2007-08
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Frankie Trazzera
Trine · 2018-19
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curtis Judd
Southern Maine · 2018-19
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.