IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Axel Hallin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-08-31 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Northern Cyclones EHL 22 1 2 3 0.136 0.0315 0.0318 0.0667 0.0674
2015-16 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 41 4 15 19 0.463 0.1070 0.1034 0.2267 0.2191
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC SR 21 0 3 3 0.143
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 21 0 3 3 0.143
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC JR 14 2 1 3 0.214
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 14 2 1 3 0.214
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 22 0 4 4 0.182
2016-17 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 7 0 2 2 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2016-17 · Gustavus Adolphus
+304.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15316
Defenseman overall
#1912
Defenseman born in 1995
#1873
in EHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Drew Doyon
Aurora · 2015-16
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan Pelligra
Manhattanville · 2012-13
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Andrews
St. Norbert · 2014-15
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.