← New Search ↗ Social Card

Konnor Carlson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-12-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 35 8 11 19 0.543 0.0600 0.0602 0.1720 0.1725
2019-20 Neepawa Titans MJHL 51 11 11 22 0.431 0.0830 0.0830 0.2719 0.2719
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 22 1 0 1 0.045
2022-23 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 21 1 0 1 0.048
2020-21 Augsburg D1 FR 3 0 1 1 0.333
2020-21 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 3 0 1 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2020-21 · Augsburg
+547.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
55%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42314
Forward overall
#2425
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johnson & Wales · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Stonehill · 2014-15
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.