IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Stehr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-01-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 37 2 3 5 0.135 0.0170 0.0172 0.0427 0.0431
2015-16 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 37 3 23 26 0.703 0.0882 0.0848 0.2218 0.2132
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Olaf D1 MIAC SR 24 4 3 7 0.292
2019-20 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 24 4 3 7 0.292
2018-19 St. Olaf D1 MIAC JR 23 1 4 5 0.217
2018-19 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 23 1 4 5 0.217
2017-18 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 24 0 7 7 0.292
2016-17 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#15894
Defenseman overall
#2040
Defenseman born in 1996
#2603
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aidan Penner
Wentworth · 2003-04
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Johns
Chatham · 2017-18
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Millis
Wisconsin-Stout · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.