← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinn Mulder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 9 2 7 9 1.000 0.1925 0.1925 0.6302 0.6302
2021-22 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 53 12 30 42 0.792 0.1526 0.1404 0.4994 0.4594
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Marian D3 NCHA SR 23 2 2 4 0.174
2024-25 Marian D3 NCHA JR 23 2 0 2 0.087
2023-24 Marian D3 NCHA SO 20 3 4 7 0.350
2022-23 Marian D3 NCHA FR 25 1 1 2 0.080
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2022-23 · Marian
-33.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25808
Forward overall
#1305
Forward born in 2001
#323
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2018-19
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.