IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stephen Cochrane Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-07-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bay State Breakers USPHL-Premier-Classic 49 2 13 15 0.306 0.0859 0.0913 0.2516 0.2675
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Hamilton D1 NESCAC SR 22 2 8 10 0.455
2019-20 Hamilton D3 NESCAC GR 22 2 8 10 0.455
2018-19 Hamilton D1 NESCAC JR 25 0 2 2 0.080
2018-19 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 25 0 2 2 0.080
2017-18 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 16 0 3 3 0.188
2016-17 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 16 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#19668
Defenseman overall
#2365
Defenseman born in 1996
#250
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Declan Gunovski
Fredonia · 2008-09
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Giacomin
Lake Forest · 2015-16
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Martin
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.