← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristyn Sabina Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 43 22 22 44 1.023 0.1132 0.1038 0.3242 0.2972
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Saint John's D1 SR 7 1 0 1 0.143
2020-21 Saint John's D3 SR 7 1 0 1 0.143
2019-20 Saint John's D1 JR 26 0 1 1 0.038
2019-20 Saint John's D3 JR 26 0 1 1 0.038
2018-19 Saint John's D1 SO 17 0 1 1 0.059
2018-19 Saint John's D3 SO 17 0 1 1 0.059
2017-18 Saint John's D3 FR 8 1 0 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2017-18 · Saint John's
+40.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22986
Forward overall
#922
Forward born in 1996
#583
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2021-22
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.