← New Search ↗ Social Card

Pierce Gouin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-01 Country: USA
Western New England
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Duluth Marshall USHS-MN 18 6 6 12 0.667 0.0844 0.0844 0.1619 0.1619
2022-23 Duluth Marshall USHS-MN 27 20 21 41 1.518 0.1922 0.1922 0.3688 0.3688
2024-25 Virden Oil Capitals MJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14822
Forward overall
#751
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG

Western New England Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at Western New England
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western New England
0.36
actual FR PPG at Western New England
0.88
actual FR PPG at Western New England

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2018-19
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.