← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Tierney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New England Wolves EHL 32 6 2 8 0.250 0.0366 0.0381 0.1226 0.1277
2016-17 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 36 2 3 5 0.139 0.0203 0.0202 0.0681 0.0679
2017-18 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 49 16 30 46 0.939 0.1373 0.1292 0.4603 0.4332
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Salem State D3 MASCAC GR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salem State D1 SO 21 0 3 3 0.143
2019-20 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 21 0 3 3 0.143
2018-19 Salem State D1 FR 23 5 14 19 0.826
2018-19 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 23 5 14 19 0.826
2007-08 Fitchburg State D3 SR 26 3 5 8 0.308
2006-07 Fitchburg State D3 JR 27 4 2 6 0.222
2005-06 Fitchburg State D3 SO 26 2 5 7 0.269
2004-05 Fitchburg State D3 FR 25 1 4 5 0.200

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30361
Forward overall
#1391
Forward born in 1997
#974
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2018-19
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2017-18
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.