IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Bloem Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 44 10 10 20 0.455 0.1853 0.1822 0.3653 0.3591
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 24 4 4 8 0.333
2021-22 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 10 3 0 3 0.300
2019-20 Potsdam D1 — SO 20 1 4 5 0.250
2019-20 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 20 1 4 5 0.250
2018-19 Potsdam D1 — FR 23 9 7 16 0.696
2018-19 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 23 9 7 16 0.696
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2018-19 · Potsdam
+346.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
68%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18261
Forward overall
#861
Forward born in 1998
#609
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Harrison Niemann
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2006-07
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Joss
Gustavus Adolphus · 2023-24
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Domitrovic
Elmira · 2018-19
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.