IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Bloem Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 44 10 10 20 0.455 0.2534 0.2491 0.3675 0.3613
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 24 4 4 8 0.333
2021-22 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 10 3 0 3 0.300
2019-20 Potsdam D1 — SO 20 1 4 5 0.250
2019-20 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SO 20 1 4 5 0.250
2018-19 Potsdam D1 — FR 23 9 7 16 0.696
2018-19 SUNY Potsdam D3 — FR 23 9 7 16 0.696
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2018-19 · Potsdam
+226.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
70%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20742
Forward overall
#991
Forward born in 1998
#634
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Domitrovic
Elmira · 2018-19
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Harrison Niemann
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2006-07
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Anderson
Manhattanville · 2013-14
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.