← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Cambria Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-09-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits EHLP 40 1 7 8 0.200 0.0130 0.0133 0.0450 0.0461
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 46 0 5 5 0.109 0.0159 0.0163 0.0533 0.0546
2017-18 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 28 2 15 17 0.607 0.0685 0.0651 0.2065 0.1964
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 26 4 10 14 0.538
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D1 JR 6 0 1 1 0.167
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 6 0 1 1 0.167
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D1 SO 19 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 19 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D1 FR 19 0 2 2 0.105
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 19 0 2 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2018-19 · Franklin Pierce
+144.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15222
Defenseman overall
#2201
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2017-18
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2015-16
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2016-17
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.