← New Search ↗ Social Card

Harley Michaels Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-01-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Cornwall Colts CCHL 53 0 8 8 0.151 0.0327 0.0313 0.1168 0.1119
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC GR 25 1 14 15 0.600
2022-23 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SR 25 1 4 5 0.200
2021-22 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC JR 24 3 11 14 0.583
2020-21 Albertus Magnus D1 SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Albertus Magnus D1 FR 23 1 7 8 0.348
2019-20 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC FR 23 1 7 8 0.348
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2019-20 · Albertus Magnus
+1079.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26374
Defenseman overall
#3553
Defenseman born in 1999
#1999
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2004-05
0.176 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2010-11
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2021-22
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.