← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nate Dunning Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-09-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 40 11 16 27 0.675 0.1559 0.1506 0.3303 0.3191
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Neumann D3 MAC SR 25 4 10 14 0.560
2021-22 Neumann D3 MAC JR 25 6 8 14 0.560
2020-21 Neumann D1 MAC SO 9 0 1 1 0.111
2020-21 Neumann D3 MAC SO 9 0 1 1 0.111
2019-20 Neumann D1 MAC FR 23 0 1 1 0.043
2019-20 Neumann D3 MAC FR 23 0 1 1 0.043
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2019-20 · Neumann
-69.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6796
Defenseman overall
#1379
Defenseman born in 1998
#805
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2015-16
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2005-06
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2012-13
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.